that's exactly right.  and as for due diligence when culling information from it, forget it...  better to stick with the more traditional, static and accountable sources (many of which can be added to through proper channels).

respectfully,

jeff kotanchick
kotanchick@uberbabe.com
p: seoul 82.18.873.4454
victoria 1.250.388.9278


--- <acmuller@gol.com> wrote:
>
>It was written earlier:
>
>>>There is an online encyclopedia called Wikipedia.  It is an open source
>>>project and anyone can submit >an entry or modify an existing one.  The
>URL
>>>for it is:
>>>
>>>http://www.wikipedia.com
>
>This is not to voice opposition to contributing to Wikipedia (actually, I
>have added a few things on Korean Buddhism), but would-be contributors
>should be aware that anything you add can be deleted, cut, pasted, and
>changed by anyone in the world who feels like it. I have already seen this
>happen to a couple of things that I spent a bit of time on. The changes
>were done by persons obviously possessing no academic background at all.
>This has discouraged me considerably from making further efforts.
>
>Chuck
>
>
>
>Charles Muller <acmuller@gol.com>
>Toyo Gakuen University
>
>Digital Dictionary of Buddhism: www.acmuller.net

_____________________________________________________________
this email brought to you courtesy of the supraliminal guerrilla army [sugarlab]. get uberbabe. http://www.uberbabe.com.


