Korean Studies
Internet Discussion List
KOREAN STUDIES
REVIEW
Korean American Women Living in Two Cultures, edited by Young
In Song and Ailee
Moon. Los Angeles and Taegu: Academia Koreana, Keimyung University
Press, 1997. (ISBN 0-9657616-0). 317 pp.
Reviewed by Soo-Young
Chin
University of Southern California
[This review first appeared in
Acta Koreana, 1
(1998): 163-64]
Crafted of the debates and experiences that emerge from those living in
the
margins of two cultures, this volume attempts to describe the status of
Korean culture, traditions, and personal and community experiences.
Many
essays in the book illustrate the ways in which immigrant Korean women
have
appropriated and transformed traditional roles for their own purposes,
while others express concern over the continued oppression of Korean
women
in new contexts. Yet another set of essays focuses on younger 1.5
generation women, and their on-going attempts to confront the sources of
their oppression more openly. Even though several of the essays discuss
the importance of traditional Korean strategies for traversing between
cultures, that women are not recognized for their contributions to
family,
work and community and that Korean American women are oppressed are the
generalizations more often repeated.
The topical focus of the anthology is its strength as this allows for a
diversity of disciplines, methods, and perspectives to be included.
This
ensures that there is at least one essay of interest to students and
scholars of Korean American women. The topical focus is, however, also
its
weakness. As most students and scholars are not as broadly trained as
the
representation of disciplines and methods in the volume, it is hard for
any
reader to fully appreciate the range of approaches and perspectives
included in the volume. While the introductory chapter provides a
general
sense of the materials included in the volume, the essays are not
conceptually analyzed or organized for the reader, an effort that could
have provided readers with a better handle on the materials.
While the table of contents suggests that the materials are divided into
scholarly and personal perspectives, this is not the most evident
division
of essays. Rather, essays seem divided along three purposes. First,
there
is a set of survey articles that map an area of research and study to
make
suggestions for intervention. Ailee Moon and Trang Hoang's essay on
intergeneration relations (Chapter 4), Daniel Boo Duk Lee's article on
servicemen's wives (Chapter 6), Young In Song's piece on domestic
violence
(Chapter 9), and Jun Hee Kim, Ailee Moon, & Hae Sook Shin's article on
elderly Korean women (Chapter 10) are articles that seem to address the
service provider or policy maker.
Second are essays that embed empirical findings about
Korean American women into western conceptual models, not only in
defining
terms such as sexual oppression, but also in terms of constructing
ethnicity. Young In Song's essay on the patriarchal structure of the
Korean
American Christian church (chapter 5), Young In Song's article on
midlife
(Chapter 9), Aera Kim's piece of Christianity and Korean immigrant women
(chapter 11) and Young In Song's article regarding global feminist
issues
are theoretically tied to standard western ideals. While this strategy
was
critical as a means of bringing issues of ethnicity to the table, it is
unfortunate because it bifurcates identity along a continuum which
differentiates American (modern, civilized, masculine, whole) from
ethnic
(primitive, savage, feminine, fractured). The problem with the use of
western paradigms to explain non-western or hybrid practices is the
frequent lack of fit which renders the non-western or hybrid somehow
less
desirable, primitive, or somehow inferior to western ways.
The personal essays of this genre attempt to re-interpret the ethnic end
of
the continuum. While the essays are responses to the bifurcated model
of
American versus ethnic, Paula J. Trout's tribute to her adopted parents
(Chapter 13), Sandra Lim's personal essay about growing up (Chapter 14),
Elizabeth Shon's essay about identity and self-esteem (Chapter 15),
Kristine Kim's piece on building ethnic identity and pride (Chapter 17),
and Nellie Byun's essay of personal history (Chapter 18) bring out the
positives of Korean American cultural influences on identity processes.
While this is an important step in re-shaping the ethnocentrisms
inherent
in conventional western conceptual models, it still takes the either/or
position of a binary as its starting point.
The last type of article attempts to move beyond binary conceptual
models.
Rather than conceptualizing identity as pulls along a continuum of two
extremes, these essays suggest multiple axes of identification, of which
ethnic identity may be just one. Alice Yang Murray's descriptive
re-interpretation of early women's contribution to the early community
(Chapter 2), Brenda Kwon's analysis of multiple tongues in Choi's
Year of
Impossible Goodbyes (Chapter 3), Jung Ha Kim's ethnographic study of
women
in the Korean church (Chapter 7), Mia Kim's essay on interracial
marriage
(Chapter 16), Judy Han's essay on Queer Korean America (Chapter 19), and
Janet Chunghee Chang's essay on multiple roles complicate the
cartography of
identity construction. While ethnic affiliation is acknowledged as a
significant pull, it is also evident that identity is multi-faceted,
influenced by situational and interpersonal factors as well as life
stage,
age, and cohort influences.
The purpose to which these articles speak, in many ways, reflects the
diversity of the experiences of Korean American women in America. There
is
a wide range of attitudes, beliefs, and practices among Korean American
women - from those whose lives are primarily a struggle for survival, to
those who adhere to more western standards of self-construction, to
women
who have reconstructed themselves in a more organic fashion which
reflects
their lives.
Citation:
Chin, Soo-Young 1998
Review of Young In Song and Ailee Moon, eds., Korean American Women
Living
in Two Cultures (1997)
Korean Studies Review 1998, no. 10
Electronic file: http://koreanstudies.com/ks/ksr/ksr98-10.htm
[This review first appeared in Acta Koreana, 1 (1998): 163-64]
Return to Index of
Reviews
Return to Entry
Page