[KS] women ph.d.'s in korean history

[karen palmer]

Women are generally well-represented in "terminal" master's degree programs which do not generally lead to careers in academia. I'm curious as to whether the same 'overwhelming' numbers of women apply specifically in Ph.D. programs, and particularly so in Korean history. I think it would be misleading to speak of women in terms of all graduate students and in such a broad category as "Asian Studies" in reference to the dearth of women in Korean history.
 
In addition, it seems that although there is great diversity among male candidates in terms of ethnicity and educational background and qualifications that if female it seems generally unlikely to be accepted to a Ph.D. program in Korean history anymore unless one is bilingual and has completed up through a bachelor's degree in a Korean university, as there does not seem to be a great many non-ethnic-Korean women or Korean-American women in such programs.
 
-Karen Palmer

cra10 at columbia.edu wrote:
Dear all,

One slight correction to Mark's note: the junior position in UCLA is
a female graduate of Chicago, not UW (Namhee Lee). As for grad
students, I don't know about other institutions, but at Columbia
the ratio of students in Korean history and literature is grossly
imbalanced in favor of females. Of the twenty or so graduate
students in Korean Studies in the the departments of East Asian
Languages and Cultures and in History, only 4 are male. So if
Columbia is at all representative, the next generation of Korean
history and literature professors will be mostly women. But I'd be
curious to hear how the gender balances of graduate populations are
in other Korean Studies programs.

Charles Armstrong
Associate Professor of History
Columbia University

Quoting Mark Arlen Peterson :

> Greetings all,
>
> Concerning Ms. Palmers note:
>
> If we look at the question of gender balance in Korean Studies --
> more broadly than Korean history -- it looks a little better,
> well, .... in some ways. It's certainly more complex.
>
> First, in regard to history, Martina Deuchler has retired but is
> still working and writing. The Korean history positions at
> Harvard (Kim Sun Joo, as mentioned) and at UCLA and the
> University of Utah are all held by UW female PhD. Harvard has
> given PhD's in history to Susan Shin and Sherry McCullough as
> well as Martina Deuchler. Hesung Koh has worked in history, but
> I'm not sure what her PhD was in. Law? Legal history?
> Anthropology? Pae Hyungil at UC Santa Barbara has a PhD in
> history/archaeology from Harvard. At at Columbia, we must cite
> ChaHyun Kim-Haboush as a major figure at a major institution.
>
> If we look at language teaching, the opposite imbalance is
> obvious -- more females. At AATK meetings (American Assocation
> of Teachers of Korean) there are very very few male teachers.
> Linguistics PhD's go disproportionately to females, it appears,
> with major positions at George Washington and UCLA held by women.
>
> Political Science is really lopsided on the male side. I think
> there is only one practicing female PhD in political science.
> Here there may be grounds for complaining, but maybe not in
> history.
>
> Anthropology has more females, Laurel Kendall, Linda Lewis, and
> if we include ethnomusicology, Hillary Finchum at ICC in San
> Francisco, there are perhaps more females in this field than
> males. ???
>
> Literature is fairly evenly balanced, isn't it?
>
> So, Ms. Palmer, there may be an imbalance in Korean history but
> the wider field of Korean Studies is closer to the golden mean.
> At least, that is this observer's cursory conclusion.....
>
> with best regards,
> Mark Peterson
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: karen palmer 
> To: Korean Studies Discussion List 
> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:53:16 -0800 (PST)
> Subject: [KS] women ph.d.'s in korean history
>
> It appears that the field of Korean history in terms of academic
> positions held and even in numbers of Ph.D.s granted is heavily
> male-dominated. Wasn't Kim Sun Joo the first female Ph.D. to come
> out of the University of Washington, and isn't that a bit of a
> late start in encouraging female scholars in this area? In my
> opinion, it's a loss to the overall quality and scope of
> academic research in history when women's voices are left out. It
> would be strange to assume there were no women capable of or
> interested in a particular subfield of history while overall
> women have come to outnumber men in Ph.D.s granted in humanities
> and social sciences. Although it involves the study of several
> languages, Korean history is not rocket science, and women do not
> generally self-deselect in these areas.
>
> In contrast to the University of Washington, which academic
> institution has shown a better track record in terms of
> encouraging female scholars, and what are the numbers and ratios
> involved?
>
> Karen Palmer
> (prospective graduate school applicant in korean history)
>
> caprio wrote:
> You should look at Kim Sun Joo's dissertation.
> I do not have the title with me but she looked
> at the 1812 rebellion and talks about discrimination.
> It was completed in 2000 at the University of Washington.
>
> Good Luck,
>
> Mark Caprio
> Rikkyo University
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> All your favorites on one personal page � Try My Yahoo!
>
>
>
>




		
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
 Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://koreanstudies.com/pipermail/koreanstudies_koreanstudies.com/attachments/20050118/870da40b/attachment.html>