[KS] Ch'oe Sejin; Days of the Week; Choso^n Dynasty Regnal Years
Baker Don
ubcdbaker at hotmail.com
Sat Jun 11 12:07:11 EDT 2005
I'll leave it to the historical linguistics people to answer the first
question, though I would like to add a related question: When did Koreans
first begin writing Chinese characters on the palms of their hands with
their fingers when they wanted to show a listener which Chinese character
they were talking about?
As for the days of the week, that is clearly a Japanese import. The whole
notion of a 7 day week wasn't accepted in Seoul until the end of the 19th
century and it took a while to get people in the countryside to start
thinking about a week as 7 days long rather than 10. A month was
traditionally divided into the first 10 days, the 2nd ten days, and the 3rd
ten days. As for the exact name for a specific day of that ten-day week, I
don't know of any, though the literate could use the appropriate hanja pair
from the sixty cyclical calendrical items that were used to name days and
years.
As for official dates on documents, as a tributary state of China, Korea
was supposed to use Chinese reign titles for dates. In internal documents,
Korean reign titles could be used (as long as the rulers in Beijing didn't
find out about it). It has also been reported that, especially in the 17th
and 18th centuries, some Koreans who refused to accept the legitimacy of
the Manchu conquest of the Ming, continued to use Ming reign dates long
after the Ming was dead. I vaguely recall seeing a Ming reign date on an
18th century Korean document, but don't remember when or where I saw it.
Don Baker
Associate Professor,
Department of Asian Studies
Director, Centre for Korean Research
University of British Columbia
Vancouver, Canada V6T 1Z2
dbaker at interchange.ubc.ca
<br><br><br>>From: "Stefan Ewing"
<sa_ewing at hotmail.com><br>>Reply-To: Korean Studies Discussion
List <Koreanstudies at koreaweb.ws><br>>To:
Koreanstudies at koreaweb.ws<br>>Subject: [KS] Ch'oe Sejin; Days of the
Week; Choso^n Dynasty Regnal Years<br>>Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 18:22:55
-0700<br>><br>>Dear KS list members:<br>><br>>I have three
arcane questions, all on topics that have nothing to do <br>>with
romanization. The first concerns the _hun_ readings <br>>(traditional
definitions) of hanja, the second the Korean names of <br>>the days of
the week, and the third the numbering of years using <br>>Korean versus
Chinese reign names. The first two may perhaps be of <br>>the "Why
is the sky blue?" variety, but I am confident that at least
<br>>some among you may be able to answer them.<br>><br>>1. In
_okp'yo^n_ (hanja dictionaries), the _hun_ readings (native <br>>Korean
definitions) of characters often use archaic words or <br>>_natch'ummal_
for nouns, or the determinative _-(u^)l_ ending for <br>>verbs and
adjectives. Examples will be familiar to most readers: <br>>_me san_
for "mountain"; _o^mi mo_ for "mother"; _kal wang_ for
<br>>"go."<br>><br>>This practice would appear to be of
rather ancient origin. The <br>>question is, how ancient and to whom
may we attribute these <br>>delightfully fascinating but fossilized
forms? Is this due to the <br>>work of Ch'oe Sejin in his 1527 _Hunmong
Chahoe_, his great <br>>collection of hanja with Hangul glosses? I
don't suppose there <br>>could be any attestations to this practice that
are much older than <br>>his work, unless Koryo^-era scholars wrote
definitions in Idu!<br>><br>>2. How did the naming of days in Korea
and Japan after the Sun, the <br>>Moon, and the planets (or traditional
five elements) come about? <br>>The correspondence between the seven
days of the week in Korean and <br>>Japanese on the one hand and
European languages on the other is <br>>surely too similar to be a
coincidence.<br>><br>>The English names of the days of the week
denote the Sun, the Moon, <br>>Mars (the Teutonic deity Tiw), Mercury
(Woden), Jupiter (Thor), <br>>Venus (Frigga (sp.?), and Saturn, in that
order. Similarly, the <br>>Korean and Japanese names of the days of the
week denote the Sun, <br>>the Moon, Mars (Hwaso^ng), Mercury (Suso^ng),
Jupiter (Mokso^ng), <br>>Venus (Ku^mso^ng), and Saturn (T'oso^ng)
respectively.<br>><br>>I notice than in modern written Chinese, days
of the week are <br>>numbered, their names having nothing to do with any
sort of <br>>cosmological system. I also see that in the Kyujanggak's
online <br>>edition of the _Ilso^nggi_ (late Choso^n-dynasty court
diary), days <br>>are named or numbered using the _yuksip kapcha_, the
same system <br>>used for numbering years in vernacular documents of
that period. <br>>Was there any system for naming days of the week
(rather than as <br>>part of a 60-day cycle) in use at that time? How
did the <br>>correspondence between names of days of the week and the
planets (or <br>>five elements) come about? Is this a modern
contrivance from the <br>>late 19th-century drives for
westernization?<br>><br>>3. Someone recently informed me that he
believed that during the <br>>Choso^n/Joseon Dynasty (at least prior to
1896 when the era <br>>_Ko^nyang_ began), while Korean regnal years
(reign years; yo^nho) <br>>were used for dating the Sillok (royal
chronicles), _Chinese_ regnal <br>>years were used for dating official
documents. Thus, the year 1887 <br>>would have been recorded as
"Kojong 25 nyo^n" in the _Kojong <br>>Sillok_, but as
"Kwangso^ [Guangxu] 13 nyo^n" in official documents. <br>>
Could someone please tell me whether this is in fact the
case?<br>><br>>I will be grateful for any and all answers to these
vexing <br>>questions!<br>><br>>Thanks,<br>>Stefan
Ewing<br>><br>>_________________________________________________________________<br>>Take
advantage of powerful junk e-mail filters built on patented
<br>>Microsoft? SmartScreen Technology.
<br>>http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines
<br>> Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN? Premium right now and get
<br>>the first two months FREE*.<br>><br>><br>
More information about the Koreanstudies
mailing list