[KS] North Korea says multiracialism is poison
Mark Peterson
markpeterson at byu.edu
Mon May 1 23:55:19 EDT 2006
Greetings old friends and new. This racial thing has touched off a
view observations that I would like to add to the mix.
On the issue of North Korean concepts of racial purity, South Korea
was once in a similar position -- I think things have improved
measurably in the South today, witness all the cross-cultural marriages
that are pushed today.
One curious figure in the history of South Korean racial constructs
was a man named An Hosang. An was Syngman Rhee's first Minister of
Education -- that says a lot since the Minister of Education must
assure that the correct line is taught in school, after all.
An was a strong anti-Communist hardliner, as you would expect, but
then became a spokesperson for racial ideas later in his career. In
the 70's and 80's when he was in his 70's and 80's, he became the
author and advocate of a concept then called the "hanbalk" people or
race. This putative racial group went back to the earliest history and
beyond, included Tangun, of course, but went beyond that to include
what the Chinese records called the tongi (they wrote it dong yi) the
"eastern barbarians". An argued that this group was not only what we
might think of as Altaic people of northeast Asia, proto-Koreans
perhaps, but also the people of the Shangtong peninsula and therefore
included none other than Confucius himself. Yes, Confucius was Korean.
Why, of course! He was from the eastern sections, and so were the
Koreans. Certainly they were connected as racially superior stock.
His outlandish ideas had currency for a time with a certain sector of
the population, but I haven't heard of any of that kind of thing
lately. But at the time, I found it all rather curious -- this search
for roots, and this idea of racial purity that was part and parcel of
it.
I looked into An Hosang's background a bit, and found his paksa
credentials were from a university in Germany -- in the 1930's.
Achtung! There is something to be said for the desire to find one's
pure Aryan or let's make it hanbalk roots, isn't there?
Fortunately, South Korea has not gone down that road much. The South
Korea of today can at least stop and look at itself from the
perspective of Hines Ward's mother. She was right to throw it in their
faces, the hypocrites who were wining and dining her on that day would
not let her in the banquet hall when she was raising her child alone.
She suffered a lot raising her son, but her efforts are now recognized
and praised, and maybe society is a little more open today than it was
then. We can be grateful that South Korea has turned a corner and is
not going down the road An Hosang or Kim Jong Il would lead us. I'm
not sure how much it has turned the corner, but there are some hopeful
signs out there.
Back on the point of banners in the streets of Seoul advertising
marriages with Vietnamese and Mongolian and Chinese women -- I was
surprised on my last trip to Korea to find those banners hoisted along
the major roads in Seoul. Beginning about six or seven years ago, I
began seeing those signs in the country side. "First marriages;
Remarriages; Engagements" -- they would say. It made sense that
country boys, farm boys, without good marriage prospects would be
interested in a foreign bride, any bride! But now we see the banners
in the heart of the city. No, the issue in South Korea is not racial
purity. It's a practical matter of finding a wife for the gender
imbalanced society that has selectively eliminated a few too many
female fetuses.
Just a few observations...
with best regards,
Mark Peterson
More information about the Koreanstudies
mailing list