[KS] Revised Romanization Detailed Guidelines?

[Frank Hoffmann]

Two brief note regarding Hyoungbae Lee's last note:

QUOTE:
-----
-3. Oneureun nalssiga jota (RR)
-4. Oneul eun nalssi ga jota 
    (most probably, National Library of Korea version of RR)
-----

That would be yet another bad "handling" of RR. The ONLY advantage of 
RR oder McC-R that I can see is that it can be machine generated by the 
simplest means, which makes a huge difference for e.g. cataloging 
books, but also -- more important! -- in industry, administration, and 
international relations. Once this kind of -- in my opinion obscure -- 
stops are introduced as they exist in McC-R (just as obscure there), 
this advantage will be gone. The simple result will be just one more 
rule in existence to be disregarded by the majority of people. 
Why do I call this "obscure" -- apart from the just made technical 
argument? Because transcription systems should be there to emulate a 
language in another script known to the reader. What sense does it make 
to introduce new orthographic rules (about word divisions) in a 
transcription system (except for writing systems that don't know stops, 
such as classical Chinese).

Frank