[KS] Kanghwa Treaty diplomatic protocol
Frank Hoffmann
hoffmann at koreaweb.ws
Wed Nov 14 16:20:23 EST 2007
And hello again:
My apologies for putting this in two postings -- this is an afterthought.
Christine dropped the term Chosôn t'ongsinsa.
That seems to be the keyword, in a sense. I now
think that professor Sand's question in itself
might need to be rephrased. After the 16th
century Hideyoshi Invasion there were twelve
Chosôn t'ongsinsa (Korean envoys) to Japan: 1607,
1617, 1624, 1636, 1643, 1655, 1682, 1711, 1719,
1748, 1764, and 1811. None after 1811, as far as
I know. Korea encapsulated itself, as we all know
(and Japan had done so before, but still kept up
its relations with Korea). I think -- please
correct me if I am wrong -- that Korean
historians usually do not place that Japanese
delegation to Korea for the Kangwha Treaty within
the traditional exchange of delegations between
the two countries. And I think it should not, as
it obviously resulted in the forceful opening of
Korea (or was the result of the forceful
'opening,' however way one wants to phrase it).
It is also no coincidence that the place of that
meeting was on Kanghwa, and not Pusan or
elsewhere close to Japan. This delegation's
meeting simply did not follow the traditional
Chosôn period diplomatic protocol (which, of
course, must have changed a lot over time). I
would rather address the question in a different
way: was it Japan that had demanded the chairs
and to otherwise also follow the diplomatic
protocol of Western countries, or was it the
Korean court that wanted to "keep up" with the
new situation? After all this was now Meiji
Japan, not anymore Tokugawa.
Best,
Frank
More information about the Koreanstudies
mailing list