[KS] Origin of term "자연부락"?
Frank Hoffmann
hoffmann at koreanstudies.com
Thu Jun 30 00:22:44 EDT 2016
Part II:
Looked a little further into this .... Shin Gi-Wook thematized that in
his article on "Agrarianism: A Critique of Colonial Modernity in Korea"
(1999):
http://www.jstor.org/stable/179429
He is giving a single reference to that term as used by KOREAN
romantic, agrarian nationalists in 1931 (within that "agrarianism"
movement (p. 799). I still doubt it was anything like a popular term
though.
What I am missing from this otherwise very informative article -- from
the point of view of intellectual history -- is some sort of tracking
of where that whole movement came from, what roots it has. Eitarō
Suzuki 鈴木榮太郎, often introduced as the "pioneer of Japanese rural
and urban sociology," used a similar
term in 1940: _shizen mura_ 自然村, which closely resembles 자연 마을,
but both mean basically the same.
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jsr/63/3/63_424/_article
In any case, as the old fascist proverb says, Tutte le strade portano a
Berlino, all roads lead to Berlin -- it looks to me as if the whole
concept for the definition of "natural village" and "village community"
originates in German NS concepts of "Dorfgemeinschaft" (village
community). At the very latest by the late 1930s this and related
concepts were widely read and adapted in Japan by sociologists and
anthropologists. If you take a stroll through older issues of UNESCO's
_Korea Journal_ and look at articles by e.g. Lee Man-gap (who published
widely in English ... I am not familiar with other Korean sociologists
from the 1960s and 70s, as this is not my turf), you will see that many
texts come close to one-to-one translations of those concepts --
one-to-one, but having travelled there in two steps, first from Germany
to Japan, then to Korea. These ideas and concepts, of course, were not
exactly invented by the Nazis ... and
you sure also find them in earlier decades in Britain, or a little
later in national China and elsewhere. Yet, with the growth of fascism
in the 1920s and the 1930s they got a huge boost.
Now, the understanding and the definition of terms evolves over time.
And that is how such a term can be seen as representing "nationalist
left" as well as "fascist-nationalist" ideas also. See e.g. the take on
it within Minjung historiography (see below article about that).
David Nemeth, but you've probably already seen that, thematizes the
term in his chapter in the wonderful volume _Sitings_ (Hawaii UP 2008).
Best,
Frank
--------------------------------------
Frank Hoffmann
http://koreanstudies.com
More information about the Koreanstudies
mailing list