[KS] Re: North-South Standard Dialects, Regionalism
Jason Shaw Parker
parker.294 at osu.edu
Tue Aug 8 09:29:36 EDT 2000
REPLY sends your message to the whole list. __________________________________________________
John,
As far as I am aware, regionalism is the result of the geographic
composition of the peninsula. This created very difficult terrain to cross
in the Yi and previous periods prior to modernization, which lent its hand
at creating regional differences through separation. The dialect question
is an interesting and good one. I had always taken the "Seoul" position at
face value without questioning it. I know of one anthropologist who has
done linguistic work in Korea but his name escapes me at the moment. If I
can come up with it, I'll forward you the citation. I also was taught that
"standard" textbook Korean was the Seoul dialect. I believe it is mentioned
in the text published by Yonsei University, I would have to double check
that though.
Jason Parker
At 06:00 AM 8/8/00 +0000, you wrote:
> REPLY sends your message to the whole list.
> __________________________________________________
> When I studied Korean (in the 1970s), one of my teachers claimed that
> "textbook" Korean in the South was the Seoul dialect with some elements
> of Kyongsang-do dialect added in, whereas in the North standard Korean
> combined elements of Pyongan and Hamgyong dialects. Does anyone know of
> a study that could confirm this?
>
> Also, I was discussing with a friend the regionalism in the south. Did
> that always exist in its current strength, or has it been, as I have
> heard claimed, something that certain political leaders (perhaps from
> both ruling and opposition parties) cultivated at the expense of unity?
>
>Sincerely
>
>John Duggan
>
>________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
>
More information about the Koreanstudies
mailing list