[KS] Standards of Professional Conduct

[Matthew Shapiro]

First of all, a valid vehicle for publicly discussing these matters has
been made already: publish a book review or sit on an author-meets-critics
panel. Secondly, this is no longer a discussion but a rehashing of the same
or similar points. As a non-historian, but one who is still very much
concerned with research ethics and who reads each KS post from
top-to-bottom, publishing a book review is the appropriate vehicle for
"public discussion of academic deception."

Matt Shapiro

On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Jiyul Kim <jiykim at oberlin.edu> wrote:

> The American Historical Association's Standards of Professional Conduct
> contains this statement:
>
> *"Scholarship flourishes in an atmosphere of openness and candor, which
> should include the scrutiny and public discussion of academic deception."*
>
> If you agree with this as I do, and if Korean Studies forum is not the
> place for this "public discussion" of scholarship about Korea, as some
> subscribers seem to opine, then where?
>
> https://www.historians.org/jobs-and-professional-
> development/statements-and-standards-of-the-profession/
> statement-on-standards-of-professional-conduct
>
> Jiyul Kim
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://koreanstudies.com/pipermail/koreanstudies_koreanstudies.com/attachments/20161003/ac57c601/attachment.html>