[KS] Standards of Professional Conduct
Kap Seol
kapseol at yahoo.com
Mon Oct 3 10:28:06 EDT 2016
Agreed!
> On Oct 3, 2016, at 10:10 AM, Matthew Shapiro <matthew.shapiro at iit.edu> wrote:
>
> First of all, a valid vehicle for publicly discussing these matters has been made already: publish a book review or sit on an author-meets-critics panel. Secondly, this is no longer a discussion but a rehashing of the same or similar points. As a non-historian, but one who is still very much concerned with research ethics and who reads each KS post from top-to-bottom, publishing a book review is the appropriate vehicle for "public discussion of academic deception."
>
> Matt Shapiro
>
>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Jiyul Kim <jiykim at oberlin.edu> wrote:
>> The American Historical Association's Standards of Professional Conduct contains this statement:
>>
>> "Scholarship flourishes in an atmosphere of openness and candor, which should include the scrutiny and public discussion of academic deception."
>>
>> If you agree with this as I do, and if Korean Studies forum is not the place for this "public discussion" of scholarship about Korea, as some subscribers seem to opine, then where?
>>
>> https://www.historians.org/jobs-and-professional-development/statements-and-standards-of-the-profession/statement-on-standards-of-professional-conduct
>>
>> Jiyul Kim
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://koreanstudies.com/pipermail/koreanstudies_koreanstudies.com/attachments/20161003/183caa40/attachment.html>
More information about the Koreanstudies
mailing list