[KS] Standards of Professional Conduct

Kap Seol kapseol at yahoo.com
Mon Oct 3 10:28:06 EDT 2016


Agreed!

> On Oct 3, 2016, at 10:10 AM, Matthew Shapiro <matthew.shapiro at iit.edu> wrote:
> 
> First of all, a valid vehicle for publicly discussing these matters has been made already: publish a book review or sit on an author-meets-critics panel. Secondly, this is no longer a discussion but a rehashing of the same or similar points. As a non-historian, but one who is still very much concerned with research ethics and who reads each KS post from top-to-bottom, publishing a book review is the appropriate vehicle for "public discussion of academic deception."
> 
> Matt Shapiro
> 
>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Jiyul Kim <jiykim at oberlin.edu> wrote:
>> The American Historical Association's Standards of Professional Conduct contains this statement:
>> 
>> "Scholarship flourishes in an atmosphere of openness and candor, which should include the scrutiny and public discussion of academic deception."
>> 
>> If you agree with this as I do, and if Korean Studies forum is not the place for this "public discussion" of scholarship about Korea, as some subscribers seem to opine, then where?
>> 
>> https://www.historians.org/jobs-and-professional-development/statements-and-standards-of-the-profession/statement-on-standards-of-professional-conduct
>> 
>> Jiyul Kim
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://koreanstudies.com/pipermail/koreanstudies_koreanstudies.com/attachments/20161003/183caa40/attachment.html>


More information about the Koreanstudies mailing list